<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>malshag.org &#187; art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malshag.org/tag/art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malshag.org</link>
	<description>chronicles of a family</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:20:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>500 days of selfishness</title>
		<link>http://malshag.org/2009/12/500-days-of-selfishness/</link>
		<comments>http://malshag.org/2009/12/500-days-of-selfishness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seriouslythough.org/?p=1955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After drooling over the film's trailers for the months it was in the theater, my wife and I finally rented <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1022603/" title="500 days of summer">500 Days of Summer</a> with <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0330687/" title="Joseph Gordon-Levitt">Joseph Gordon-Levitt</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0221046/" title="Zooey Deschanel">Zooey Deschanel</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After drooling over the film&#8217;s trailers for the months it was in the theater, my wife and I finally rented <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1022603/" title="500 days of summer">500 Days of Summer</a> with <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0330687/" title="Joseph Gordon-Levitt">Joseph Gordon-Levitt</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0221046/" title="Zooey Deschanel">Zooey Deschanel</a>.  Based on the film&#8217;s popularity and the tidbits publicized about the plotline, I wouldn&#8217;t be giving anything away by spoiling that it&#8217;s about the guy losing the girl and not getting her back.  I will, however, give other things away, so if you&#8217;ve stumbled onto this page via Google and haven&#8217;t seen the film, go ahead and stop reading.</p>
<p>The film presents itself with an undertone of conflict as to the nature of fate.  The female love interest, Summer, doesn&#8217;t believe love exists or that she has found or will ever experience love while the male protagonist, Tom, believes that the idea of a soulmate is not only possible but can be laced with destiny.</p>
<p>In keeping with the aforementioned storyline, Summer decides after getting closer to Tom than she has anyone else before him, she does not want to be with Tom anymore.  After his depressed weeks of emotional churning over the loss of what he believed was his &#8220;one true love&#8221;, Tom runs into Summer in a train car on the way to a mutual friend&#8217;s wedding.</p>
<p>Summer is visibly warm to the poor guy during the wedding reception, dropping inside jokes from their relationship, dancing with him to Etta James&#8217; &#8220;At Last&#8221;, the most romantic of songs.  Toward the end of the night she invites him to a party at her place, to which he shows up to find her sporting a large engagement ring.</p>
<p>Further depressed weeks of emotional churning find Summer successfully married when she shows up to Tom&#8217;s favorite spot in the city and backhandedly gives him &#8220;closure&#8221; on their relationship.  He explains that having been burned, he no longer believes in fate or love.  She explains that she now believes in fate and love, just not with him.</p>
<p>While the switch in positions was foreseeable when it became evident that Tom was not going to ever win back the object of his undying affection, the film in hindsight was less about the overt struggle over the idea of fate and love through apparent love and loss, and more about the underlying exercise in exploring the unbridled depths of a girl&#8217;s selfishness.</p>
<p>At the height of his inner turmoil, Tom has a conversation with his younger sister Rachel, during which she puts the idea in his mind that perhaps Summer wasn&#8217;t really &#8220;the one&#8221;.  This is news to both Tom and the film&#8217;s viewers, as Summer in some respects has been so far portrayed without flaw.</p>
<p>Tom begins a memory montage of the previous months, taking the viewer through each previously lived-through scenario from a different perspective, one filled with warning signs and perhaps more reality-based than his prior fantasy-laden rollercoaster ride.  To Tom, the memories are laced with indicators that she may not have liked him as much as he believes she had, that maybe it wasn&#8217;t the fated love he believed it to be.  To the viewer, the memories are laced with signs that Summer has been as toxic as a waste dump.  She is what gentlemen refer to as a &#8220;tar baby&#8221;, once the surface is penetrated, there is no chance of ever being extracted from complete, hopeless submission.</p>
<p>Tom&#8217;s interactions with Summer began innocently, he initiated light conversation right up until the point that a friend let it slip to her that Tom liked her.  From that point on, she initiated all interactions and escalations.  She kissed him unprompted in the copy room, she undressed in his bed, she pulled him into the Adult section of the video store, she told him her deepest darkest secrets.  When he angered at her seeming lack of outspoken commitment, she showed up at his apartment in the middle of a rainy night.  She expressed every action indicative of physical and emotional intimacy, all the while refusing to outwardly admit she was even dating him.  She drove the proverbial bus, and took Tom for a ride.</p>
<p>She also initiated the breakup of this mind game of a relationship, going her own way free to find someone else to pretend not to date.  When Tom ran into her at the aforementioned wedding, she couldn&#8217;t help herself but to see if there is still any fertile soil in which to plant, stringing him along emotionally for an evening while she not only had no intention of making her actions amount to anything, but was also <i>about to get engaged to someone else</i>.</p>
<p>Her visit to Tom&#8217;s favorite spot in the city, during which she bestowed on him the &#8220;I now believe in fate, just not with you&#8221; conversation, ended up in even more manipulation, as she placed her hand on his for a long, dramatic moment before she got up to leave.  Even as a married woman, she couldn&#8217;t resist riding him around one last time.  It was ultimately the height of both selfishness and inappropriateness.  Tom clued in to this a bit, he made a passing comment during the conversation that she &#8220;gets to do whatever she wants.&#8221;</p>
<p>By the end of the film, Tom begins the first of an open-ended number of days with his new love interest Autumn, with whom he strikes up a conversation waiting for a job interview to begin, and who coincidentally shares the same love for Tom&#8217;s favorite spot in the city.  The audience can presumably stand up and cheer due to Tom&#8217;s renewed belief in fate, and the credits can roll as the film has upheld the existence of the classic religion of America, the Church of Romantic Love.  This viewer stood up and cheered for a different reason.  I suspect Tom didn&#8217;t even realize how lucky he was to rid himself of the sick and twisted Summer and her selfish, manipulative grasp.</p>
<p>Though it has been days since I&#8217;ve watched this film, I can still taste my disdain for the Summer character in the back of my mouth.  It would normally appear that I didn&#8217;t care for the film and its unpleasant storyline.  On the contrary, I felt this film was fantastic.  The writers, directors, and cast succeeded in the most important aspect of film making: they created a character that they developed enough to cause me to have an exceedingly strong emotion toward that character.  To create a piece of art that evokes emotion at all is, to me, a success, and this film&#8217;s storyline and characters will be memorable for some time to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malshag.org/2009/12/500-days-of-selfishness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>excursions</title>
		<link>http://malshag.org/2006/04/excursions/</link>
		<comments>http://malshag.org/2006/04/excursions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[me and e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuppycakes.org/2006/04/17/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saturday brought a trip out to the <a href="http://www.themodern.org">Fort Worth Modern</a> for me and E, we went to catch the <a href="http://www.chuckclose.coe.uh.edu/">Chuck Close</a> exhibit.  Although using different methods of creation, he's spent his artistic career focusing solely on printmaking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturday brought a trip out to the <a href="http://www.themodern.org">Fort Worth Modern</a> for me and E, we went to catch the <a href="http://www.chuckclose.coe.uh.edu/">Chuck Close</a> exhibit.  Although using different methods of creation, he&#8217;s spent his artistic career focusing solely on printmaking.</p>
<p>I had a surprisingly emotional reaction to the whole thing.  Out of the large number of prints displayed, many were of his own face.  Others were of loved ones, family friends.  I got the feeling as I walked around that I was watching the results of one man&#8217;s efforts to make sense out of the trials and events of life that every human at some point is faced with making sense out of.  I don&#8217;t know about societies other than Western, but I imagine in most cultures the individuals have some struggle with natural life issues like confronting their own mortality and grieving for the death of loved ones, various reviews of their lives to see whether or not they withstand the acid test of personal ideas and notions of achievement, struggling with feelings of whether or not they&#8217;re going to exit the planet having left anything of lasting value.  We all have various ways of dealing (or in most cases, not dealing) with these as they arise, and I couldn&#8217;t help but become overwhelmed by the idea that I was watching this man&#8217;s way.</p>
<p>It felt incredibly personal.  I&#8217;m pretty humbled by any encounter I have with watching people&#8217;s lives unfold as they grow old, seeing photographs of various stages of one person&#8217;s life, seeing old friends after getting bigger bellies and losing more hair, watching generations of a family together in the same space in a way that illustrates how quickly time can pass.  It has a certain way of dwarfing day to day circumstances and bringing perspective where there was none.</p>
<p>One print in particular struck me more deeply than the others.  On the far wall in the second room was a print he made of his wife&#8217;s visage, his wife of thirty-five years.  The entire print, almost three feet tall, he made using his own fingerprints in varying levels of ink.  I knew I was staring at something more intimate than could ever be put into words.</p>
<p><img src="http://static.picassomio.com/images/art/pm-40388-large.jpg" alt="chuck close portrait of wife" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malshag.org/2006/04/excursions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
